Search Engine Friendly (sef) urls
Is
there a big difference when using Google's own URL?
No, in my experience, it
is much more a second or third order, perhaps even less, when used alone. However - there is a detectable benefit in URLs.
Here
is a list of URLs that you can use to create a custom ID.
I
think it's a good idea. I optimized as they did.
It
is also possible to isolate one of the following factors:
Where
everyone's advantage is easily
detectable is when people (e.g., in forums) link to your site using the URL as a link.
Then
it is fair to say that you get a boost because the keywords are in the actual
anchor text link to your site, and I think it is, but again, this is dependent
on the quality of the page link to your site Web. That is, when Google trusts
him and hands over Page Rank (!) And the anchor text benefit.
And,
of course, you will need to quote your site content.
Sometimes
I will remove stop words from a URL and leave important keywords, such as the
title of the page, how many forums will mutilate a URL to shorten it. Most
forums will not be traced in 2017 to be fair, but some old habits harsh.
Clean URL (or friendly URLs for search engines) is simple, clean, easy to read, simple.
Sometimes I prefer to see the exact expression that I name as the name of the URL I ask to sort Google.
Sometimes I prefer to see the exact expression that I name as the name of the URL I ask to sort Google.
1. www.seoworkereb.blogspot.com//?p=292
- is automatically modified by the CMS with URL Rewrite
2. Www.seoworkereb.blogspot.com/websites-clean-search-engine-friendly-URLs/
- which then break something like
3. Www.seoworkereb.blogspot.com/search-engine-friendly-URLs/
Keep
in mind that Googlebot can crawl pages with dynamic URLs; It is assumed by many
webmasters that there is a greater risk that they will give up when URLs are
considered unimportant and contain multiple variables and session ID (theory).
As a standard, I use clean URLs
wherever possible in new sites these days, and I'm trying to keep the URL as
simple as possible and thus not obsessed.
This
is my goal at any time when optimizing a website to work better on Google -
simplicity.
Google
search for keywords in the URL, even at a granular
level.
A
keyword in the URL to have can be the difference between the rankings of your
site and not - potentially useful advantage of long lines of the research wait
- for more a
keyword in the URI (filename) account see Google in the ranking of a page?
Absolute
or relative URL
My
advice would be consistent with what you choose.
I
prefer the absolute URL. It's just a privilege. Google will creep if your
locale is developed properly.
· What is an absolute URL?
Example - http://www.seoworkereb.blogspot.com/search-engine-optimisation/
· What is a relative URL?
Example - /search-engine-optimization.
Him
Relative
means only with the document in which the link is located.
Move
this page to a different page and it will not work.
With
an absolute URL, it would work.
Sub directories or files for the URL structure
Sometimes
I use subfolders and sometimes I use files. I have not been able to decide
whether it is a real benefit (in terms of higher ranking) either to use it.
Many CMSs currently use subfolders in your data
source, so I'm sure Google can deal with either.
I
used to have the files rather than. Html when I was building a new site from
scratch because they were the "end of the line" for the search
engines, as I imagined, and a subdirectory (or directory) was a collection of
pages.
I
used to think of it, could take more of a trustworthy subfolder to get a single
file to say, and I think it's me shaking the files to use on most of the websites I use (during the day). Once
subfolders are familiar, it is 6 or a half-dozen, which is the difference in
placement at Google - usually, placements
at Google are more determined by how serious or under a page is a query.
In
the past, differently handled files will be subfolders (in my experience).
Subfolders
have less confidence than other subfolders or pages of your site, or completely
ignored. Subfolders * * a little longer seemed to be indexed by Google, for example, Html.
People
talk familiar domains, but they do not mention (or do not believe) that part of
the area can trust less. Google treats certain subfolders... .. Differently.
Well, they used - and remember how Google used to handle things - even in 2017.
Some
say they do not have four levels of folders in the file path. I have not
experienced too many problems, but you never know.
UPDATE - I think in 2017, there is even less to be feared. There are
much more important things to check.
